Breaking
How transparency in choosing VCs influences varsities’ devt, growth  — Research  Politics

How transparency in choosing VCs influences varsities’ devt, growth  — Research 

By Joseph Erunke, ABUJA

How fair and transparent the selection process of the vice-chancellor is, has a great role to play in how the university turns out in terms of development and growth during the tenure of such a vice- chancellor, a study has shown.

According to the research findings, universities that adopt transparent, accountable and inclusive leadership selection processes consistently record better governance outcomes, stronger institutional stability and higher levels of public trust.

This was disclosed at a public lecture hosted by the Abuja Leadership and Governance Centre at the University of Abuja, 

The lecture, themed: Leadership Selection Process and Governance of Federal Universities in Nigeria (1993–2024), was used to unveil findings of a research study which linked transparent leadership recruitment to stronger university governance and improved institutional performance.

Speaking at the event, the Executive Secretary of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFund, Arch. Sonny Echono, expressed strong dissatisfaction over political interference in the appointment of vice-chancellors in Nigeria’s public universities, declaring that the growing influence of politics, nepotism and corruption in leadership selection is undermining academic excellence, institutional stability and good governance.

Echono called for a sweeping overhaul of the vice-chancellor appointment process, insisting that only a strict merit-based and transparent system can rescue the nation’s universities from declining governance standards.

He warned that when university leadership positions are determined by political interests rather than competence, the consequences extend beyond campuses and threaten the quality of graduates, research output and national development.

“Political interference, nepotism and corruption remain among the greatest threats to good governance in our universities. When leadership appointments are influenced by factors other than merit and competence, the entire institution suffers,” he said.

The TETFund boss stressed that federal universities must be shielded from undue external influence if they are to fulfil their mandate of producing quality manpower and driving innovation.

He noted that institutions where stakeholders are actively involved in leadership selection tend to enjoy healthier governance structures and stronger commitment to ethical standards.

“The research clearly demonstrates that transparent and inclusive leadership selection processes are critical to effective governance in our federal universities. Institutions that prioritise accountability and stakeholder engagement consistently record better governance outcomes,” he said.

He further argued that vice-chancellors who emerge through credible and competitive processes are better positioned to promote research, encourage collaboration among scholars and create an enabling environment for teaching and learning.

As part of reforms, Echono advocated the introduction of uniform national guidelines governing leadership appointments in federal universities, including clear qualification criteria, transparent procedures and robust stakeholder participation.

He also proposed the establishment of inclusive search committees comprising representatives of academic staff, students, alumni and industry stakeholders to enhance credibility and public confidence in the process.

The TETFund chief equally called for all leadership vacancies to be publicly advertised and for universities to leverage technology-driven systems such as online application portals, electronic voting platforms, virtual town hall meetings and digital reporting mechanisms to strengthen transparency.

He further recommended independent audits of leadership appointments and governance practices, as well as effective grievance channels for stakeholders.

“Accountability must remain at the heart of university governance. Regular audits and credible feedback mechanisms are essential safeguards against abuse, manipulation and violations of established procedures,” he stated.

The warning by Echono comes amid growing concerns over controversies that have trailed the appointment of vice-chancellors in several public universities across the country, with allegations of undue influence and political manipulation increasingly dominating debates within the higher education sector.

Also speaking at the event, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Abuja, Prof. Hakeem Babatunde Fawehinmi, echoed concerns about the state of governance in Nigerian universities, cautioning that some governing councils were beginning to politicise the process of appointing Vice-Chancellors.

He stressed the need for academic leadership, institutional reforms and governance structures anchored on merit, competence and integrity.

Earlier, the Director of the Abuja Leadership Centre, Prof. Abdulhamid Ozohu-Suleiman, said the centre was established by TETFund to promote leadership excellence and strengthen governance capacity in Nigeria.

The lecture featured a panel discussion involving experts who examined the persistent challenges surrounding leadership selection in universities and explored pathways for restoring transparency, credibility and meritocracy to the system.

The event underscored growing calls within the education sector for reforms aimed at insulating Nigeria’s universities from political pressures and ensuring that leadership positions are occupied by the most qualified candidates rather than the most connected.